Skip to content


Why Apple’s TV could fail

Three reasons:

Limited screen choices. Some people want medium size screens, some want big ones, some want huge ones, Some people want LCD screens, some want plasma, some want an LCD or DSP projector, some are eying OLED. Apple is likely to bring out only one screen technology in at most a few sizes.

Competition and timing. Other companies are already jumping on the rumors and bringing out TVs that are better integrated with the net and with easier user interfaces. At this year’s CES we see Nuance showing a voice activated TV interface. Apple will do these things much, much better, but they will also wait until it works very well and decent content is lined up before even making any announcement. Credible competition will be on the market by then. And if people have already bought an expensive new TV they aren’t going to buy another one right away.

Steve is gone. Apple has great people in place who work well together, but Steve was the final arbiter and quite often made last minute calls that improved the product greatly. As one example, remember when at the last minute Steve made a change in the first iPhone from giving it a plastic screen to a more expensive but durable glass one? Imagine the iPhone coming out with a scratchy plastic screen instead of the awesome gorilla glass! These are expensive, scary kinds of calls that only Steve could push through.

My suggestion is to make a new generation Apple TV box. This has many advantages and one big drawback.

Why does Apple want to be in the TV itself instead of in a set top type of box in the first place?

First, this puts the Apple software in the first input rather than the second. Any add on box has to go into some kind of Aux input and thus can’t pre-empt the main input. We see this in the current Apple TV box. If I’m on my iPad and I have a video I want to throw on the TV, it’s easy to tell the iPad to put it on the Apple TV box through AirPlay. But there is a show stopper – I also have to switch the TV input from the main cable box to the aux input my Apple TV box is on. With AirPlay built right into the TV, It will switch over automatically.

Second, an external box can’t integrate very tightly with the TV. The Apple TV has an HDMI output which sends audio and video, but it can’t change the TV input, channel, volume, see what channel it is tuned toor anything else. By being built into the TV, this is all solved. And by building the TV itself, Apple can do tricks no other TV can, witness their recent patent on unique ways to make black letterbox bars truly black by manipulating the backlight.

The first problem is solvable. Just add an HDMI input to the current Apple TV box, and place it between the tv and the user’s cable box. This lets the Apple TV take over the top tier input for AirPlay or viewing content, let’s it overlay it’s own video on the cable’s video, and so on.

It is the second problem that caused, I think, Apple to decide to actually manufacture a TV. The traditional solution, putting an IR blaster on the Apple TV to let it imitate a TV or cable box remote control is so kludgey and hard for the user to set up that I’m sure Apple could never stomach it. Very tight integration between hardware and software has always been the key to Apple’s success. I believe in coming years the problem could be solved because HDMI is adding new communication channels that will allow TV and cable and receiver control, but it isn’t even close to being all there yet.

So even though Apple’s cool core of voice control and asking to see a show rather than a channel could go into a standalone box, Apple feels it has to actually make the TV so things can be tightly integrated.

But your choice of TV will be very limited. Competition, weak but everywhere, will already be out there, snapping up the available customers before they have a chance to see the better product. And, Steve won’t be there to put the last minute, ultra-important final touches on the product.

Maybe Apple, after a while, could license manufacturers to make their new TVs in a variety of screen technologies. But could you see Apple going the licensing route? More likely they will bring out a new size each year, something like that, while other manufactures flood the market with half as good a product at half the price – a strategy we are currently seeing in the tablet market. But the TV is a commodity. The competition could hurt this time.

Posted in Apple Inc., AppleTV.

Tagged with , , .


Apple iPad 2 Smart Cover: The Third Angle

Most people know the Apple iPad Smart Cover can prop up the device at two angles – a low angle good for typing, and a high angle good for watching video. But you can set the iPad at a another, in-between angle, as the middle picture here shows:

To get this angle, fold the cover in half, then lift up the end segment and prop the iPad against it. It’s not quite a solid as the other two angles, but it is pretty stable and very useful!

Posted in Apple Inc., iPad.

Tagged with , .


Apple iPhone voice recognition will soon explode

Like many smart mobile phones, the Apple iPhone includes a voice recognition feature. Simply hold down the Home button for a few seconds until you hear a tone, and speak into it: “Call John Smith”. The phone will look for John Smith in your contacts, and dial the number. It knows a few other tricks too, for example you can say “Play music” and tunes will start playing.

That’s nothing compared to what is coming soon.

A company called Siri Inc., has a great voice control app. You can get it on your iPhone for free, it’s called Siri Assistant [iTunes App Store] Open the Siri app, touch the “Speak It!” button, and ask it a question – ANY question. It will recognize your question and get the answer from the Internet, then show it to you. It’s quite amazing. You can ask how many ounces are in a gallon, how much does the Earth weigh, where is the nearest Chinese food, call me a taxi, and so on. It calls upon many web resources, and other information such as your current location, to  get answers.

I believe some time soon, this facility will be integrated into the iPhone iOS operating system itself. Instead of running an app, you just hold the Home button and ask your question. Imagine the usefulness of this – press a button and ask you iPhone any question, and in seconds, it tells you the answer.

It gets better than that. In Siri, you don’t have to limit yourself to questions, you can give it orders as well, such as set an alarm, book a reservation, send a tweet. If it gets something wrong, you can speak corrections or modifications without repeating everything.

Currently, Siri displays a little text monologue as it works out an answer “One moment…” “Looking for ‘Chinese food’ near ‘Cold Spring Harbor NY’”, “Here is what I found:”. It’s cool, but would likely be replaced by the current text to speech system in the phone – it would be that Majel Barett-like synthetic voice you can currently hear the iPhone use when you turn on its VoiceOver feature.

This is great, but when will it happen? Soon, but there are some obstacles to overcome.

First of all, Siri calls upon many outside Internet resources to get its information. The Siri app says it has over 30 partners it calls upon, such as OpenTable, MovieTickets.com, Taxi Magic, Yelp, Nuance, even Microsoft’s Bing. To integrate Siri as it is into iOS, Apple would have to make deals with all these companies. That’s quite a task.

Also, while the iPhone currently has its own voice recognition system built into the iOS itself, it is limited. That is why it can currently just do a few things like dial and control iTunes. Siri recognizes just about anyone’s voice saying anything. How does it do that? By sending your voice over the Internet and using Nuance Inc. voice recognition engine. So, for this to work, Apple would have to do the same – record your voice, send it to the Internet, and process it. Apple would have to set this all up in some big data center somewhere.

What if you weren’t hooked up to the Internet at the moment? Should it say to get connected and try again? Should it say “Let me get back to you on that” and save the query until the phone can get online? Probably the latter. And once the information is retrieved, it can’t just interrupt you, it needs to queue up the answer and give you a discrete beep or something, waiting until you are ready to listen to or take a look at the answer.

Note that Siri is not a voice recognition company – it uses Nuance technology to do that. The core of Siri is it’s ability to understand what you want. When you say “weather Tuesday”, it knows you want the nearby weather. If the next thing you say is just “Wednesday”, it knows that you are now asking for the nearby Wednesday weather, and so on. It is the parser technology  that makes Siri so interesting.

In fact, Siri was so interesting to Apple that they bought it last year. And Apple has a big new data center that can handle lots of incoming voice recognition requests, parse them, research them, and send answers very quickly. This technology is going into iOS, and likely Mac OSX as well, and soon. One day, there will be one more thing – “Oh, and I can now ask my phone anything!” And everyone will be surprised. Everyone except you and I.

Posted in Apple Inc., iPhone, Macintosh.